A paper on what worked
Rooms, Not Windows: five days of streams, every quote checked.
01 / What it was
Rooms, Not Windows is a working paper on what the streams showed. It asks a simple question: what happens if every agent gets a place?
It reports a five-day field study, 25 to 29 October 2026, of the builder using Omo Space as his main workspace, plus a second user. It is not a controlled study.
02 / How it worked
- Seven recordings, about 29 hours, transcribed with a small speech model.
- The corpus was split into eight chunks, each read in full by a separate language-model reader that pulled out claims, quotes, demos and failures.
- A script checked all 791 extracted quotes against the transcript, within three minutes of the stated time: all 791 passed.
- Claims were grouped by hand and counted by how many of the eight chunks they appeared in.
03 / What we saw
Four everyday problems of running many agents turned into spatial ones: finding became walking to it, resuming became returning to where you left it, monitoring became looking down a hallway, and orchestration became walking a pipeline of rooms. The same streams show a lot breaking, and the paper lists it.
04 / Where it led
It ends with four hypotheses a controlled study against ordinary tabs could test.
Sources
- Rooms, Not Windows. working paper, draft v0.1, 29 Oct 2026
what happens if every agent gets a place?
- Rooms, Not Windows, method. working paper, draft v0.1, 29 Oct 2026
all 791 passed
- Rooms, Not Windows, abstract. working paper, draft v0.1, 29 Oct 2026
we frame these as design findings and testable hypotheses rather than proven effects.